<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~d/styles/rss2full.xsl" type="text/xsl" media="screen"?><?xml-stylesheet href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~d/styles/itemcontent.css" type="text/css" media="screen"?><rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0">
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Telecom Ramblings</title>
	
	<link>http://www.telecomramblings.com</link>
	<description>Musings on fiber, IP, content, and telecom</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 16:41:33 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="self" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/TelecomRamblingsComments" type="application/rss+xml" /><item>
		<title>Comment on Verizon Makes Its CDN Move by Verizon’s End Run Around Net Neutrality</title>
		<link>http://www.telecomramblings.com/2008/11/verizon-makes-its-cdn-move/#comment-1050</link>
		<dc:creator>Verizon’s End Run Around Net Neutrality</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 12:39:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.telecomramblings.com/?p=1188#comment-1050</guid>
		<description>[...] Verizon Makes Its CDN Move  [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Verizon Makes Its CDN Move  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Verizon Makes Its CDN Move by fanfare</title>
		<link>http://www.telecomramblings.com/2008/11/verizon-makes-its-cdn-move/#comment-1049</link>
		<dc:creator>fanfare</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 20:37:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.telecomramblings.com/?p=1188#comment-1049</guid>
		<description>cutting out the middle ... yup that is what they are doing.  Makes sense doesn't it?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>cutting out the middle &#8230; yup that is what they are doing.  Makes sense doesn&#8217;t it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Verizon Makes Its CDN Move by Brian Scully</title>
		<link>http://www.telecomramblings.com/2008/11/verizon-makes-its-cdn-move/#comment-1048</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian Scully</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 19:21:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.telecomramblings.com/?p=1188#comment-1048</guid>
		<description>I called it back in your July 21st post.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I called it back in your July 21st post.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Verizon Makes Its CDN Move by Rob Powell</title>
		<link>http://www.telecomramblings.com/2008/11/verizon-makes-its-cdn-move/#comment-1047</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob Powell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 15:32:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.telecomramblings.com/?p=1188#comment-1047</guid>
		<description>After thinking about it for a bit, isn't verizon making an end-run around the net neutrality debates?  After all, what is a CDN tuned for FIOS customers if not preferential treatment for content providers that pay them for it?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After thinking about it for a bit, isn&#8217;t verizon making an end-run around the net neutrality debates?  After all, what is a CDN tuned for FIOS customers if not preferential treatment for content providers that pay them for it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Metro Fiber Providers Q3 Update by Jason</title>
		<link>http://www.telecomramblings.com/2008/11/metro-fiber-providers-q3-update/#comment-1046</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 15:07:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.telecomramblings.com/?p=1123#comment-1046</guid>
		<description>what about Ntelos in VA? Probably 300+ buildings and DukeNet in the Carolinas?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>what about Ntelos in VA? Probably 300+ buildings and DukeNet in the Carolinas?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Verizon Makes Its CDN Move by Ryan Lawler</title>
		<link>http://www.telecomramblings.com/2008/11/verizon-makes-its-cdn-move/#comment-1045</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan Lawler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 14:55:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.telecomramblings.com/?p=1188#comment-1045</guid>
		<description>Rob -- Thanks for the link. It's pretty clear that cutting out the middleman is exactly what Verizon wants to do. They want to get a cut of the money that media companies and others are paying CDNs, especially since they think they've found a way to better deliver video to their own access customers. Plus, this is a way for them to make more money off that big fiber access plant than to just charge end user subscription fees. BTW -- As far as I know, the press release went out this morning.

toddforthree -- Netflix is one customer that is licensing content from the Starz Play broadband video service, but Verizon is another. Basically anyone that wants access to the Starz content library for broadband purposes is free to do so.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rob &#8212; Thanks for the link. It&#8217;s pretty clear that cutting out the middleman is exactly what Verizon wants to do. They want to get a cut of the money that media companies and others are paying CDNs, especially since they think they&#8217;ve found a way to better deliver video to their own access customers. Plus, this is a way for them to make more money off that big fiber access plant than to just charge end user subscription fees. BTW &#8212; As far as I know, the press release went out this morning.</p>
<p>toddforthree &#8212; Netflix is one customer that is licensing content from the Starz Play broadband video service, but Verizon is another. Basically anyone that wants access to the Starz content library for broadband purposes is free to do so.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Verizon Makes Its CDN Move by toddforthree</title>
		<link>http://www.telecomramblings.com/2008/11/verizon-makes-its-cdn-move/#comment-1044</link>
		<dc:creator>toddforthree</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 14:31:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.telecomramblings.com/?p=1188#comment-1044</guid>
		<description>if i remember correctly wasnt neflix distributing starz movies?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>if i remember correctly wasnt neflix distributing starz movies?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Q4 Projections &amp; Model for Level 3 by BC</title>
		<link>http://www.telecomramblings.com/2008/11/q4-projections-model-for-level-3/#comment-1043</link>
		<dc:creator>BC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 05:32:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.telecomramblings.com/?p=1161#comment-1043</guid>
		<description>COGS goes down this quarter.

Currency may have a positive impact if we start to the Euro rally against the dollar going into December and year end.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>COGS goes down this quarter.</p>
<p>Currency may have a positive impact if we start to the Euro rally against the dollar going into December and year end.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Q4 Projections &amp; Model for Level 3 by Rob Powell</title>
		<link>http://www.telecomramblings.com/2008/11/q4-projections-model-for-level-3/#comment-1042</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob Powell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 01:21:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.telecomramblings.com/?p=1161#comment-1042</guid>
		<description>Morty, one can certainly hope.  I only have it going up somewhat because last quarter's savings seemed high and could be a perturbation, and because otherwise the revenue and ebitda guidance from the company seem inconsistent. 

But on the other hand, what would be best is if COGS goes up while gross margin goes down, since that necessarily results from good revenue growth!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Morty, one can certainly hope.  I only have it going up somewhat because last quarter&#8217;s savings seemed high and could be a perturbation, and because otherwise the revenue and ebitda guidance from the company seem inconsistent. </p>
<p>But on the other hand, what would be best is if COGS goes up while gross margin goes down, since that necessarily results from good revenue growth!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Level 3 Digs Up $400M to Refinance With by carlk</title>
		<link>http://www.telecomramblings.com/2008/11/level-3-digs-up-400m-to-refinance-with/#comment-1041</link>
		<dc:creator>carlk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2008 17:22:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.telecomramblings.com/?p=1167#comment-1041</guid>
		<description>Tortellinboy,

Do you have a recipe for the answers to your questions? :-)

If the float continues to be narrowed by the controlling interests, how much will be available if the controlling interests want to maintain a tight fisted approach to their shares? 

It seems that the recent buys by those same institutions are nearly as much as the SI both in # and percentage terms. 

The answers to these questions are better proposed to the Wall Street "store keepers" and regulators, however. 

This is the most manipulated security I wish I never have to experience in my lifetime, not because it breaks EMT rules, but because the broken rules only go in ONE DIRECTION.  :-(</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tortellinboy,</p>
<p>Do you have a recipe for the answers to your questions? <img src='http://www.telecomramblings.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>If the float continues to be narrowed by the controlling interests, how much will be available if the controlling interests want to maintain a tight fisted approach to their shares? </p>
<p>It seems that the recent buys by those same institutions are nearly as much as the SI both in # and percentage terms. </p>
<p>The answers to these questions are better proposed to the Wall Street &#8220;store keepers&#8221; and regulators, however. </p>
<p>This is the most manipulated security I wish I never have to experience in my lifetime, not because it breaks EMT rules, but because the broken rules only go in ONE DIRECTION.  <img src='http://www.telecomramblings.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif' alt=':-(' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
