FCC to AT&T: Err, What Fiber Roll-out Are You Pausing?

November 17th, 2014 by · 6 Comments

On Friday, the FCC took AT&T’s show of displeasure toward President Obama’s net neutrality stance and turned it around. After AT&T’s CEO Randall Stephenson publicly pulled the emergency brake on its fiber network rollouts, the FCC wants to know just what it is they are pausing.

AT&T has Austin of course, but the promise had been to add another 10 or so unnamed metro areas to the queue. With the DirecTV acquisition, they promised to hook up 2M customers with FTTH. However, those vague plans have yet to actually materialize in the form of actual fiber. Some see AT&T’s public fiber rollout plans as more of a defensive PR move against Google and other potential competition than actual interest in an FTTH expansion.

Thus, the FCC responded to AT&T’s public suspension of such projects by asking for information on just what the telecommunication giant has in the oven that it can pause. And they want the details in a week.  Will AT&T back down?  Or is a hurricane brewing on the beltway?   There’s certainly enough hot air around at the moment to power one.

In this case, I think AT&T’s leadership leaped without looking and will be seeking a way to cut its losses.  It may not be scientific, but Ramblings’ Friday poll reaches telecom industry people and even it has tilted in favor of Obama’s net neutrality stance (at least so far).  Notably, Tom Wheeler’s supposed hybrid plan hasn’t gotten anybody excited either.

If you haven't already, please take our Reader Survey! Just 3 questions to help us better understand who is reading Telecom Ramblings so we can serve you better!

Categories: Government Regulations · Internet Traffic

Join the Discussion!

6 Comments So Far

  • Anonymous says:

    Crony capitalism: its a helluva drug

  • Also says:

    Rob, I bet that many of the people on your board who support net neutrality do so because (not despite) they know how this industry works.

  • JPW? says:

    It’s not “Obama’s net neutrality”. It’s just Net Neutrality, and Obama, for once, didn’t try to invent some twisted version like Wheeler or AT&T to allow service providers to continue to manipulate traffic to squeeze competition and extract more money from consumers. Unfortunately now Net Neutrality is going to be associated with Obamacare and other administration boondoggles in the minds of the uninformed.

  • Parkite says:

    …..love it. Awesome FCC. Call their bluff. ATT’s FTTH plans have always been vague. At least Verizon did something with FiOS.

  • davidrohde says:

    Great line I agree with: “In this case, I think AT&T’s leadership leaped without looking and will be seeking a way to cut its losses.” That’s independent of anyone’s position on net neutrality. For my own take written for corporate users on why AT&T’s tactic of using network investment / capital expenditures as blackmail in the public policy arena is an outdated habit, please see this and thanks.

  • not a total bluff says:

    not a big fan of T, but they did put out RFP for fiber construction in several markets and it was a big number of miles

Leave a Comment

You may Log In to post a comment, or fill in the form to post anonymously.

  • Ramblings’ Jobs

    Post a Job - Just $99/30days
  • Event Calendar