Clearwire’s Game Isn’t Chess and Isn’t Chicken Either

December 1st, 2011 by · 3 Comments

For the last month and a half, the media has likened the Sprint/Clearwire soap opera to a variety of games – baseball, global thermonuclear war, and of course chess. Now I’m a chess player, and these guys are not playing chess.

In chess, there is only black and white, win or lose.  There is no alternative to sign a contract under which both hope to prosper, no possibility of mutually assured destruction.  There is only strategy, logic, calculation, timing, attack, and defense – and absolutely no whining.

Dan Jones over on LightReading suggests that what Clearwire is doing is playing a nice friendly game of chicken. That’s closer I think, but I have a better analogy in mind.

There is a ‘sport’ in which most of the action involves people yelling unnecessary threats at each other into microphones in separate locations — threats only the gullible believe and which would probably result in legal action if actually carried out. These threats are then overplayed by eager media only interested in keeping the controversy alive until the big event, whose result was determined in a back room somewhere long in advance.  And of course, each opponent is economically tied at the hip to the other both before and after the match.

Yes, that’s the game Sprint and Clearwire have been playing for us: professional wrestling. And like professional wrestling, it can only end one of two ways: with a highly scripted, outrageously climactic three minute match in which both sides cheat obviously while the ref is distracted and the champion wins until the inevitable rematch, or with a highly scripted, outrageously climactic three minute match in which both sides cheat obviously while the ref is distracted and the challenger wins until the inevitable rematch.

Clearwire will make the payment, and Sprint will grudgingly fund them just enough to set up that rematch in a few months. All else is theatre.  Unless of course it’s ratings week.

If you haven't already, please take our Reader Survey! Just 3 questions to help us better understand who is reading Telecom Ramblings so we can serve you better!

Categories: Wireless

Join the Discussion!

3 Comments So Far

  • Carlk says:

    Your version represents a ‘conspiracy.’ I have a tin foil hat to supply you with, Rob. Who are they conspiring against except themselves? It doesn’t bode well for their reputations in the marketplace with a host of other players especially their vendors.

    Were they attempting to shake their trees of unwanted equity owners as part of this conspiracy, or give someone else a dirt cheap entrance point?

    I think the game that has been played is ‘HARD BALL’ by Sprint who always needed to acquiesce for optimal results according to their ownership stake. I don’t believe that there were winks and nods taking place in back door rooms.

    In the meantime, here’s the deal with the debt payment being made on time.

    Speaking of dirt cheap entrance points, I was thinking that LVLT’s new Asian owner was aiding and abetting some new buyer to scoff up shares at a one day trough during the wake of the European Banking Crisis, when they filed to sell shares at an inopportune time which they later claimed they weren’t selling. I wish Arvind would check his comment section, and respond to his readers.

    In this silly game called The Stock Market, it’s not uncommon to find the enemy dwelling from within from time to time.

  • Level3 says:

    toes_that_twinkle or waylonglvlt , I’d like to play a game of chess with either one of you at Pogo – online.

  • schmuckinsurance says:


    Instead of professional wrestling, you could have just said politics.


Leave a Comment

You may Log In to post a comment, or fill in the form to post anonymously.

  • Ramblings’ Jobs

    Post a Job - Just $99/30days
  • Event Calendar