AT&T, T-Mobile Retreat, What Does It Mean?

November 25th, 2011 by · 5 Comments

The legal team at AT&T (NYSE:T, news, filings) didn’t get much of a Thanksgiving break. Following the FCC’s bombshell earlier this week moving to oppose the merger, the AT&T and Deutsche Telecom AG (ETR:DTE, news, filings) have formally but temporarily withdrawn their applications to the FCC. AT&T now also says it will take a $4B charge in Q4 to account for the likelihood that the deal won’t happen and they’ll be on the hook for that hefty breakup fee. But both companies say they are committed to making the deal happen, but will focus on the DOJ antitrust approval first while reconsidering their overall approach.

That’s the party line anyway, but of course there are other ways to look at this – other implications worth considering:

  • Renegotiating the breakup fee?  AT&T may be taking a charge this quarter, however if the deal is dead they still may have leverage to perhaps tweak the terms.  What if they choose to pursue the DOJ trial and appeals thereafter?  T-Mobile and DT lose time, and they’re losing market traction all the time yet are committed to backing this deal and not considering alternatives.  If DT is ready to call it quits behind closed doors, AT&T could negotiate a better exit for themselves by merely threatening not to give up so easily.
  • Does DT have any viable options?  Well, we know this merger was by far the best payout available to them, but if you take it off the table they certainly had other possible routes they could have taken.  With the breakup fee in hand they would still need quite a bit more money to pour into the US business to revive it, and some are speculating they might move to sell their stake in Everything Everywhere over in the UK to do it.  But it doesn’t look like enough for a solo effort, which brings us to…
  • All roads lead to … Clearwire?  Suppose they did get that breakup fee relatively soon and sold out of the UK for a nice bundle. Looks to me like all roads lead to Clearwire in various forms, because Clearwire has the infrastructure in place for a shared LTE buildout and capital needs that would fit within DT’s means.  Last Spring, the problem with the Clearwire approach for T-Mobile was WiMAX.  But with an LTE plan in place awaiting funding and Sprint looking to make the most of its own cash supplies, there is an obvious path to follow here.  A direct merger with Sprint would have all sorts of problems, but for the two of them to work together through Clearwire as a means of saving overall capital – there’s just got to be a sensible plan in there somewhere.
  • Metro fiber is getting an early Christmas present – The consolidation of the wireless space to three major providers could never have been anything but bad for those supplying the fiber-to-the-tower out there. T-Mobile leases all its backhaul and more of it from competitive carriers than any of the other major wireless carriers. That would have changed if the AT&T deal went through, and I don’t see how they can be anything but happy that it appears mortally wounded.
  • Divestments to the rescue?  I don’t think so.  Potential buyers of divested assets have little incentive to help AT&T here.  The problem regulators have with the deal is not that AT&T has too many assets in a few local markets, but because it changes the balance of power across all of them.  Any divestments large enough to shift that sentiment far enough to win would almost certainly make it not worth AT&T’s time, because that change in the balance of power is precisely what AT&T is after anyway.

If you haven't already, please take our Reader Survey! Just 3 questions to help us better understand who is reading Telecom Ramblings so we can serve you better!

Categories: Mergers and Acquisitions · Wireless

Join the Discussion!

5 Comments So Far

  • Parkite says:

    Cant believe they agreed to a $4b breakup fee to begin with. Shows how much money they have to burn. Omg, what about the thousands of jobs they were going to create? I think they hurt their case in the court of public opinion with that statement.

  • Carlk says:

    I can’t believe a stock with such a massive write down of valuable “CASH” in this marketplace, has not been pummeled to new 52 week lows based upon the extreme arrogance of its CEO with no respect for his owners’ hoard. Off with his head!

    Maybe these losers/manipulators are running for the exit doors in stealth holiday fashion, and we will see the stock get its due deserve when serious investors return to the market next week!

  • Carlk says:

    “The companies’ advisers stand to lose $150 million in fees……”

  • Carlk says:

    This is for my old friend, Enron Hubbard, who may be seeking to become God rather than denying his supreme being in an Atheist’s body, while travelling somewhere out there in cyber space!

  • Anon says:

    Maybe now T can merge with sprint so that they can further avoid that competition thing… Hopefully the discounting Germans will get the memo and raise prices like Bell1 and Bell2. The nerve of these small frys to offer low prices and (egad) uncapped bandwidth. This is a huge burden to a settlement free monopoly…

Leave a Comment

You may Log In to post a comment, or fill in the form to post anonymously.

  • Ramblings’ Jobs

    Post a Job - Just $99/30days
  • Event Calendar