Ceasefire Between Sprint and Cogent?

November 3rd, 2008 by · 3 Comments

Today Sprint turned its peering connection with Cogent back on, as you can see here.  So is the war over?  It doesn’t look like it, it’s more of a unilateral ceasefire by Sprint, to let the women and children clear out. Sprint has explicitly stated that the reconnection is temporary.  In their own words:

Until this issue is resolved, Sprint will continue to work tirelessly to the extent within our control to mitigate the effects on customers. As part of an interim solution, Sprint initiated a temporary reconnection to the Cogent network on Sunday, November 2nd so that customers would have temporary access while longer-term alternate and permanent access options are explored.

We emphasize that this reconnection is temporary only, as the core issues in this dispute have not changed. Cogent was notified in advance of the November 2nd reconnection; therefore, any access disruptions occurring during this temporary period are the sole result of a negative reaction instigated by Cogent against the customers of both parties.

You can find the full text, which includes background here, and Sprint really opened up about the conflict.

Sprint essentially claims that Cogent is guilty of squatting.  That they took a trial peering arrangement, failed to satisfy the requirements, and refused to disconnect – daring Sprint to break the internet.  On October 30, it was only the last two points of interconnection that were severed, Sprint had cut all the others over the 3-4 weeks prior.  Sprint flat out denies any settlement free peering arrangement was ever agreed to:

FACT: At no time did Sprint and Cogent enter into a contract for settlement free peering. In 2006, Sprint and Cogent formed a commercial trial agreement that ended in September 2007. Cogent was unable to satisfy the agreed-upon traffic exchange criteria within the trial agreement, yet refused to pay Sprint or disconnect from Sprint’s network.

Yeesh what a mess. To sum up, Sprint isn’t backing off its position one bit, they have reconnected temporarily to allow people to make other arrangements, such as Cogent buying IP transit again.

What will Cogent do now?  I’ll wager a PR countering Sprint’s points is in the works, but will they double-dare Sprint to disconnect again?  History says yes.  They likely won’t back down anytime soon and will hit back quickly.  After all, even if they lose this battle, they need to make it not worth the trouble for others to do the same.

If you haven't already, please take our Reader Survey! Just 3 questions to help us better understand who is reading Telecom Ramblings so we can serve you better!

Categories: Internet Backbones · Internet Traffic

Join the Discussion!

3 Comments So Far

  • Anon says:

    Why don’t prior peering dispute adversaries of Cogent use this time period to also de-peer from Cogent? Cogent appears to get away with bad behavior because they only get into one de-peering dispute at a time.

  • Rob Powell says:

    Each peering arrangement has its own details which may or may not be easy to break. You realize that the disruptions caused by these conflicts can lose you customers, something nobody really wants to do right now. That said, it’s always possible.

  • skibare says:

    all the big boys need to ”’cut off” the cancer called Cogent and just let the idiots stupid enough to have Cogent as their backbone get terminated……..but, nobody has a SACK including Level3

Leave a Comment

You may Log In to post a comment, or fill in the form to post anonymously.

  • Ramblings’ Jobs

    Post a Job - Just $99/30days
  • Event Calendar