Akamai Bends to Reality

July 31st, 2008 by Rob Powell · 2 Comments


Print it! Print it!
Email it! Email it!
 Subscribe
 via Email
 Comments RSS

Akamai published its second quarter earnings today, with revenues of $194M at the low end of its guidance and earnings per share of $0.19.   More importantly, they reduced revenue and earnings guidance for the third quarter and full year.  They blamed a ‘challenging operating environment’ and macro economic trends.

Could it be that the economy is hurting the CDN business, but not even touching the booming colocation and hosting sectors, nor damaging the telecom operators?  Is content really that different a market?  I don’t actually think so, and I don’t take Akamai’s explanation at face value.  Just yesterday we heard from Dan Rayburn that both pricing trends and traffic growth in the CDN space are healthy, you can’t have good pricing and traffic growth yet claim a challenging overall economic environment - you can only claim a challenging sales environment.

Akamai’s growth for many years has been just awesome, but it had to slow down eventually.  It was able to grow like a rocket because it really had no viable competition for a long time, and that has changed with Limelight, Level 3, AT&T, and a plethora of smaller CDNs out there fighting for each deal.  Akamai remains a powerful company with a great product and continues to lead the space, but the arrival of competition means they have to compete and to maintain their former growth rate they would need to win everything.  Nobody can do that forever.  So Akamai’s growth rate must moderate, at least relative to what it would have been, and we enter a new, more interesting phase in the CDN space.

More on this topic (What's this?)
Akamai Technologies Inc. (AKAM) Earnings Preview
Akamai Technologies falls out of favour
Read more on Akamai Technologies at Wikinvest

2 responses to date ↓

  • toddforthree on Jul 31, 2008 at 10:17 am 1

    when akamai started blaming the broadband network speeds in the usa i think thats not a good sign for shareholders. thats really a lame excuse.

  • Dan Rayburn on Jul 31, 2008 at 10:25 am 2

    I think you are dead on. It’s a challenging sales environment as they have more CDNs competing for the M&E business.

    The whole idea that we need faster broadband speeds in the U.S. to create more consumption is a bad excuse. The average broadband speed in the U.S. is 3MB and is plenty fast enough for today’s content which on average is encoded around 500Kbps. Faster broadband does not equal more consumption.

    Two years ago I had a 3MB DSL. Today I have a 20MB FiOS connection. I don’t consume more content today due to my connection, I consume more because content owners have made more available.

Leave a Comment

Or start a new discussion in our Forum

Please consider recommending this article by clicking on the ShareThis icon!

Print it! Print it!

Email it! Email it!

 Subscribe

 via Email

 Comments RSS